DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY ABOUT ITEM PARAMETERS: EXPECTED RESPONSE FUNCTIONS
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Linking Item Response Model Parameters
With a few exceptions, the problem of linking item response model parameters from different item calibrations has been conceptualized as an instance of the problem of test equating scores on different test forms. This paper argues, however, that the use of item response models does not require any test score equating. Instead, it involves the necessity of parameter linking due to a fundamental ...
متن کامل#510 - Dealing With Uncertainty
The problem of uncertainty has plagued environmental regulation from the beginning. The common practice in the U.S. is to ignore or deny the existence of uncertainty, or to apply arbitrary numerical "fudge factors," then to proceed as if everything were known with a high degree of certainty. For example, a deadly amount of a chemical may be determined for mice; then a fudge factor of 100 or 100...
متن کاملDealing with Uncertainty Together
material presented is the result of a collaborative research task, drawing upon studies performed by participants in IEA-ETSAP/Annex VI and guided by the ETSAP Executive Committee. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of Governments of any IEA member state, or any agency, contractor or subcontractor thereof; nor those of the International Energy Agency.
متن کاملUncertainty andMethods for Dealing with Uncertainty
In other words then, if a machine is expected to be infallible , it cannot also be intelligent. Abstract In this note we introduce a proposal to provide a mechanism to deal with uncertainty in a PROLOG environment. The intent is that such a mechanism will enable experimental and comparative research on applications which need to deal with uncertainty. Such research is needed since the variety o...
متن کاملDealing with expected and unexpected obstacles
18 The two lines after the command line are GETFOL output. They tell us that, in order to perform reeection up, the system enters the context FLYING and then it returns back to C. We can now derive ist(NFP1,WS1) by implication elimination. Finally we enter context WS1 and prove what we want by reeection down. C@GLM:: SWITCHCONTEXT WS1; You are now using context: WS1 You are switching to a proof...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ETS Research Report Series
سال: 1994
ISSN: 2330-8516
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1994.tb01601.x